Works where you do
Integrates with your ATS. Assign and review interviews in Slack.
SWEs and FDEs analyze data, scope solutions, assign tasks to agents and test agent work. Today's interviews test none of it.
Without encouraging and having visibility into AI usage, interviews don't reflect performance in the agentic era.
Candidates spend hours or weekends, and some refuse work trials altogether. Interviewers then spend hours evaluating.
Candidates solve real, system-scope problems in their local dev environment with coding agents; how engineers work today.
Every submission comes with a clear trace of agent interactions, models and tools used by the candidate.
Solve ThinkingTrace interviews anytime, anywhere. Submissions are auto-evaluated on technical judgment and AI collaboration.
Integrates with your ATS. Assign and review interviews in Slack.
Turn folders, repos, or GitHub issues into scoped interviews in minutes.
Candidates interview in their local environments instead of a static platform. So you are always evaluating how they work with the latest tools and agents people actually use.
Use it as a take-home, a paired session with a co-interviewer, or a follow-up deep dive.
Add any custom scoring criteria to our eval suite.
Submissions are immediately evaluated on our suite of rubrics for technical judgment and AI collaboration.
Tests and rubrics are calibrated as coding agents and tools improve.
See what candidates assume, question, design and test to reveal engineering judgment.
Full visibility into agent usage, interactions, management and more to find AI-native candidates.
Each submission is compared to every other one to show you what makes this candidate's approach unique.
Open-ended problems and AI-use visibility shows what each candidate did.
No synthetic sandbox, just your favorite IDE, terminal and workflows.
Claude, Cursor, Codex, anything else.
Showcase how you scope, design, manage and test.
Work on ThinkingTrace anytime, anywhere.
Prefer email?
founders@thinkingtrace.com